Trump’s next coup attempt: The midterms

The only crisis facing our elections is that embodied by Trump himself and the conspiracy he is leading to corrupt our democratic machinery.

Imagine this: For years, a chicken farmer has had a healthy and profitable operation. The business has experienced the normal ups and downs, but no security crises have befallen it. 

One constant has been foxes trying to get at the chickens, especially in the dead of night. But over the years, the predators, though persistent in their efforts, have cumulatively taken only a minuscule number of the farmer’s birds. In time, though, an especially menacing figure emerges among the would-be raiders. And this is no ordinary fox. He is massive, crusty and mangy-looking, and long-lived and determined. And he is an extraordinarily prolific thief out in the rest of the countryside. He is a thoroughly bad lot.

This wicked old fox has a fixation on defeating the farmer’s security, but his usual nighttime sneaking about has not worked. Time for a new, bolder approach, he thinks. So one day, in broad daylight, he intercepts the farmer as the good soul is out on his rounds and mounts an extraordinary effort to gaslight the poultry man:
“Your security is rubbish. You’ve been losing chickens left, right and center to all manner of predators, and you haven’t known a thing about it. I am a fox, yes, but I am no thief, sir. Would I be here talking to you if I were intending to steal your chickens? You do have a problem, and only I can fix it, and I’ll fix it like nobody’s ever seen.

“You have to do something about this security problem of yours, the one you are not aware you have.  You have to fight like hell or you won’t have a farm anymore. The people who set up your security system and maintain it are all corrupt and dirty radicals who hate this great farm. 

“But if you put the security of your chickens in my hands, you need think no more of the matter. I got this. Your farm will become hotter than anybody’s ever seen.”

Our farmer is a solid and sensible citizen, and he knows that at the bottom of his horrid soul, this fox is a thief by an immutable rule of nature. So the farmer grabs a stick, gives the lying fox a crack across the head and sends him running and shrieking back to the distant tree line. Thus our counter-factual tale ends with victory for the good guy.

The present reality in these great United States is different and more complicated, but it does feature a contest between good and evil. 

Donald Trump gave a prime-time address to the nation on July 16 about supposed vulnerabilities and corruption in our election systems and argued for changes that he says are needed to ensure the security of those systems. The speech was a load of twaddle and a desperate attempt to gaslight the American people into believing that our elections are in crisis and under attack by sinister forces. The address was a mighty effort to gaslight the country about the security and honesty of its elections.

In reality, the only crisis facing our elections is that embodied by Trump himself and the conspiracy he is leading to corrupt our democratic machinery for ends including the benefit of a white-supremacist, fascist-minded and oligarchic minority. But perhaps his greatest object of all is to deny Democrats control of Congress so that no one will curtail his immoral use of the presidency and hold him accountable for his vast corruption.

Thus, the centerpiece of the speech was a pitch for Congress to pass the SAVE America Act. A summary of the legislation at congress.gov says, in part:
“This bill requires individuals to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote, and requires photo identification to vote, in federal elections.

“Specifically, the bill prohibits states from accepting and processing an application to register to vote in a federal election unless the applicant presents documentary proof of U.S. citizenship. The bill specifies what documents are considered acceptable proof of U.S. citizenship, such as identification that complies with the REAL ID Act of 2005 that indicates U.S. citizenship.”

The proof-of-citizenship requirement is not the only provision in the SAVE America Act. The legislation is, in fact, a Trojan horse. Kindly note that its sponsor is Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas and that his bill contains a provision that essentially copies from his home state’s anti-abortion legislation by licensing private citizens to become election vigilantes and harass other private citizens. I imagine that the MAGA-ites assume that the act will empower Republican private citizens against Democrat private citizens as well as election officials who do not play Trump’s crooked game. But the plotters should remember that the same knife that sticks the sheep can just as smoothly stick the goat.

Here is the relevant language in the legislation:
The bill (1) provides for a private right of action for certain violations, and (2) establishes criminal penalties for certain offenses.

This Trojan horse is also imbued with the Trump administration’s intention to use complaints conveniently supplied by MAGA-minded private citizens as a pretext for the Justice Department — which Trump hopes will still be led by his supplicant Todd Blanche — and the FBI under the ever-eager-to-please Kash Patel to intervene legally in just enough congressional elections where Republicans are in trouble to throw those races to the Trump loyalists. The FBI and Justice will seize election materials and declare that they have uncovered illegal and otherwise tainted ballots and will seek to disqualify enough votes to deny Democrats the number of wins they need to take control of Congress and begin holding Trump accountable. If you think this is fantastical thinking on my part, just watch how the strategy plays out if the SAVE America Act does somehow get Senate approval. Even without the SAVE America Act, they are going to try some dirty tricks.

Here’s Trump in his address that night:
“For many years I’ve called for bold, swift and decisive action to protect the integrity of America’s elections. Every American deserves to know that when they cast their vote, that vote will be counted in a system, and that is to make that system secure, one where cheating and interference are not just difficult but virtually impossible. Unfortunately, the system we have today falls catastrophically short of that standard.”

That is about as rich as rich gets. This is the same Donald Trump who on Jan. 2, 2021, telephoned Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and asked him to find 11,780 votes for Trump so that Trump could be declared the winner of Georgia’s iteration of the presidential election, which he, Donald Trump, had lost to Joe Biden. This is the man who now says our elections must be protected from “cheating and interference.” You couldn’t make this up. That dirty old fox is today telling the chicken farmer that accepting the guardianship of a fox over his chickens will guarantee their safety. Balls!

An anti-Trump sign in the Dupont Circle neighborhood of Washington, D.C., on Saturday, July 11, 2026. Photo by Gilbert Dunkley

The charlatan began his speech on July 16 with what is now a standard opening: ludicrous claims that when he came back to the White House for a second term, the country was essentially a dead husk with radical left policies sprouting from it like blooms of cordyceps fungus.

Here are just a few of his outrageous assertions:
“We had transgender for everybody.” Really? What does that even mean? He did not explain.

“… the whole world was laughing at us as a nation, but not anymore. Two years ago, our country was dead. Now, we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world. America is respected like we have never been respected before.” What do your eyes and your ears tell you? Has our country ever been laughed at and ridiculed around the world as much as it is now under the leadership of this clown named Trump? Truly, nobody has ever seen anything like it.

“No tax on Social Security for our great seniors.” Bollocks. He is speaking of a temporary, $6,000 deduction available to those 65 and older with less than $75,000 a year in income; it is in effect for the tax years 2025 through 2028.

He said that under his policies, we in this country have gone from paying “the highest price for prescription drugs anywhere in the world” to now paying “the lowest price under my most-favored-nations policy.” We are now paying “the lowest price”? That is laughably false.

To make his case that our elections were both domestically corrupt and being undermined by foreign actors, he announced that he was declassifying for release documents that show “shocking” vulnerabilities in our electoral system. You can see the documents for yourself at the White House website. They fall comically short in their role as evidence for Trump’s outlandish claims about our elections.

Some of documents dredge up speculation on the old canard about Venezuela’s rumored ability to change votes in voting machines. Now that we supposedly control Venezuela under the oversight of Viceroy Marco Rubio, surely we can get the evidence of this dastardly behavior by actors in Venezuela. I expect crickets. Continuing in the category of foreign interference, there is much speculation about China, including whether Beijing was engaging in “election influence” or was undertaking activity that was “only issue-focused” for the 202o election. Russia, Iran and North Korea also get their moment in the weak spotlight. Wishy-washy words in the nature of “probably,” “reported” and “alleged” are considerable crutches in these documents.

In his speech, the president made heavy weather of China’s supposedly obtaining tens of millions of records on American voters in an effort by Beijing to corrupt our elections, and the president accused the intelligence community of having this knowledge in 2020 and withholding it from him (remember that the 2020 general election took place under his presidency). But the unredacted portions of the documents the White House provided do not make any such case.

What the documents do show, in my swift reading of them, is disparate parts of an unwieldy U.S. intelligence community trying to get on the same page to ensure that the information it provides to its “customers” is properly sourced and credible.

Here, for instance, is an excerpt from one of the documents the White House provided (the memo appears to come from someone at the FBI):
“Based on the conflict of this information to that of the wider USIC [United States Intelligence Community], the fact that it contradicts Director Wray’s testimony to Congress, and the importance to the current administration, I think we should be ready to back up the IIR [Intelligence Information Report] with a minimum of the following information and to treat it like it will be going in front of the President. We’re skeptical of this reporting based on the portions regarding COVID that veer into conspiracy theories.
Regarding [redacted]
* How was source found?
* What is Source’s Access and Placement?
* Source’s Reliability:
° How trustworthy is source?
° How competent/knowledgeable?
* Scale of 1-10, how confident is the source in the reliability of the subsource’s information?
* Is this subsource the same one who said that the Chinese Government had underground bases in Republican states to disperse Coronavirus?
° Does this source believe this? …”

And there is this excerpt from another memo showing someone in the intelligence community moving to put a contrary and minority opinion on the record:
“As I’m sure many of you have gathered through coord comments, COI discussions, or other conversations, NIO Cyber and I have a somewhat different take on the China/election story than what has appeared in production so far. Rather than continue to argue about this and drive you all nuts, we are opting to publish an alternative analysis NIC memo. We think this is the best way for us to put our perspective on the record while not getting in the way of what the rest of the community wants to say. The lead, in short non-compartmented form, is that we assess that Beijing has taken some low-level, exploratory steps to denigrate the President and shape voter perceptions ahead of the election.”

One set of files concerns Michigan and comprises 25 documents with allegations of electoral irregularities. As I scanned the documents relating to Michigan, I saw a pattern: allegations about election irregularities; and alarmed memos between civil officials and law enforcement personnel. But nothing more. No indictments concerning the scandalous illegalities that the president alleges have taken place. No related convictions and no related pleas of guilty in any courts of law.

In that alarmist prime-time address, Trump said that some of the documents prove that “for many years, Americans were blatantly lied to about the security of our election infrastructure, including electronic voting machines and ballot-counting systems. Dishonest, almost all. They’re vulnerable and they’re easily compromised.”

None of that is true. Trump is lying and trying to undermine Americans’ faith in their election systems in exactly the way that he and his henchgoons lied and undermined the public’s faith in honest journalism.

All in all, this release of supposedly sensitive intelligence documents is a load of horse manure meant to mislead the gullible. There’s nothing there.

Because Trump is incorrigibly deceitful, you may safely take it that his motives in this election matter are corrupt. He cares nothing for secure elections. He just desires an election system in which he can put a grubby hand on the scale. Just look at the record of his lies since he lost the 2020 election. Today, he is proactively making a play to crook our election system in time for the midterm elections so that his tame Republicans remain in control of Congress and he escapes accountability. After all, the entire Republican conference on Capitol Hill is a collection of spiritless cowards insofar as speaking truth to Trump is concerned.

National Guard troops with the Lincoln Memorial as a backdrop
in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, July 18, 2026.
Photo by Gilbert Dunkley

Meanwhile, Trump is keeping the National Guard deployed in Washington, D.C., through next Inauguration Day. Why? Are they to be a sort of Republican Guard for him in case the people tire of him and rise against him? There is no practical need for the National Guard in D.C., but here they are, roaming our streets, day after day, night after night. The deployment of these nearly 5,000 troops in the nation’s capital is costing the American taxpayer hundreds of millions of dollars. And this needless deployment has already sent one National Guard member to her grave and left one of her colleagues with life-altering brain injuries.

The facade of the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, July 23, 2026. Photo by Gilbert Dunkley

And why is there tarp still covering the section of the Kennedy Center facade where Trump’s name was removed last month on the order of a judge? Trump’s lickspittles who now run the Kennedy Center have complied with the letter of the judge’s order but are defying the spirit of that order, just to soothe the toxic ego of their narcissistic fuhrer. The fact that they have not removed the tarp to reveal the name of President John F. Kennedy without Donald Trump’s name creating a stain above it tells me that they have no respect for the memory of Kennedy, whose memorial that building is.

That petty defiance of the law and craven obedience toward the occupant of the White House is yet another blaring signal to us to expect dishonesty from Trump and his enablers in any matter, great or small.

On Ukraine, Trump is an obstacle

President Trump’s constant self-reversals on the war in Ukraine must be a great comfort to Russian President Vladimir Putin, who can see clearly that although Trump occasionally talks tough about punishing Putin for the war that he voluntarily started in Ukraine, the U.S. president’s heart is just not in the business of opposing the Russian.

Trump’s record speaks for itself.

On the eve of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, as Russian military forces were massed on Ukraine’s border with Russia to the east and on the frontier with Belarus in the north, candidate Trump praised as “genius” Vladimir Putin’s declaration two days earlier that the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine were “independent” of Ukraine. Putin was “savvy” because he was going to go into Ukraine to keep the peace. What?

Pro-Russian separatists had for a decade been fighting the Ukrainian military with the goal of tearing a huge part of eastern Ukraine away from the national territory and aligning it with Russia. And from 2014, the separatists in Ukraine had the assistance of Putin’s “little green men” — Russian troops operating on Ukrainian soil but wearing military uniforms without identifying markings. Putin’s declaration on Luhansk and Donetsk, made on Feb. 21, 2022, was his way of cementing independence declarations made by pro-Russian separatists in the two regions in 2014. The proclamations purported to establish a Donetsk People’s Republic and a Luhansk People’s Republic, both occupying Ukrainian land.

You may recall that before the 2022 invasion, Putin had threatened to resort to a “military-technical solution” in Ukraine if he did not receive from NATO an assurance that Ukraine would never join the alliance and if certain other demands about NATO’s posture were not met. NATO, including the United States, rejected Putin’s demands, and so we have a war.

On Feb. 24, 2022, Putin’s forces rolled west out of Russia and south out of Belarus in an operation that the Kremlin thought would have vanquished Ukraine in a matter of days, but the war has been raging from that day to this. Ukraine, reinforced by arms flowing in from Europe and the U.S., has proved a hard nut for Russia to crack.

The Russia-Ukraine war was just another trigger for candidate Trump to tout his imagined greatness as a deal-maker and settler of conflicts. On dozens of occasions during his third presidential campaign, he declared publicly and loudly that he would end the Ukraine war before even starting his new presidency or would do it on Day One. He won the election last November and took office on Jan. 20 of this year, and we are nearing the end of October with the war no closer to being ended.

In April, Time magazine asked Trump about his unfulfilled promise to have ended the war already, and he replied:
“Well, I said that figuratively, and I said that as an exaggeration, because to make a point, and you know, it gets, of course, by the fake news [unintelligible]. Obviously, people know that when I said that, it was said in jest, but it was also said that it will be ended.”

Asked what was taking so long, Trump responded:
Well, I don’t think it’s long. I mean, look, I got here three months ago. This war has been going on for three years. It’s a war that would have never happened if I was president. It’s Biden’s war. It’s not my war. I have nothing to do with it. I would have never had this war. This war would have never happened. Putin would have never done it. This war would have never happened. Oct. 6 would have never happened. Oct. 7 would have never happened. Would have never happened. Ever.

Also during the campaign, Trump repeatedly criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for his efforts to obtain U.S. weaponry to fight off the Russian aggression, accused him of bearing blame for the war and said that Ukraine, the victim of Russia’s aggression, probably would have to cede territory to Russia for there to be peace.

On April 14 of this year, Trump again blamed Zelensky for the war. “Listen, when you start a war, you gotta know you can win a war,” Trump said at a news conference at the White House. “You don’t start a war against somebody that’s 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles.”

Trump has gone back and forth, again and again, in assigning blame for the war, even, of course, faulting Joe Biden, on whose watch as U.S. president the 2022 invasion took place. In his criticisms, Trump has been tougher on Biden and Zelensky than he has been on Putin. Remember his and Vice President JD Vance’s berating of the Ukrainian leader as ungrateful in the Oval Office on Feb. 28 of this year. Shortly after that acrimonious meeting, U.S. arms transfers to Ukraine were stopped, then quickly restarted. Trump’s pique actually figures into whether the U.S. president will support a country righteously fighting for its very life.

On Aug. 15, Trump hosted Putin in Alaska for a summit on the war. The U.S. president received the Russian graciously at an American military base, according the war-starter the courtesies appropriate for an honored guest. Putin was even allowed to lay flowers in honor of World War II Soviet pilots buried at Fort Richardson National Cemetery. The whole event was yet another instance of Trump flopping in front of Putin, who is the driving force behind a war of aggression and a man indicted by the International Criminal Court on war crimes charges.

The Alaska summit ended inconclusively, but Trump then spoke of Ukraine’s needing to give up land for a peace agreement to be realized. And here we saw, again, one of Trump’s great weaknesses: a tendency to be swayed by the disputant with whom he has most recently spoken.

On Aug. 18, just three days after the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska, Zelensky was to be at the White House again to meet with Trump. But this time, Western Europe was not going to allow Zelensky to walk into a trap as he had at the White House on Feb. 28. A delegation of NATO, European Union and other leaders from Europe rushed to Washington to support Zelensky. That meeting, too, was inconclusive.

Then came another flip. Trump and Zelensky met at the United Nations in New York in September after Trump’s address to the General Assembly. And after his meeting with Zelensky, Trump wrote on Truth Social that Ukraine could “win all of [its territory] back in its original form.”

Zelensky was back at the White House on Oct. 17, without the European posse, and that meeting did not go well, news reports say. Before the meeting, Trump had spoken of granting a request by Zelensky for Tomahawk cruise missiles to allow Ukraine to strike key targets deep inside Russia and make the war much more costly and difficult for Moscow. All seemed to be moving in Ukraine’s desired direction — until Putin called Trump before Zelensky’s visit to the White House.

Whatever Putin said to Trump moved the U.S. president’s position, and he began hedging on Tomahawk deliveries before meeting with Zelensky. The meeting proved to be inconclusive and apparently was confrontational. Immediately after, Trump was back to the line that Ukraine, the victim in the fight, needs to concede territory to Russia, the aggressor in the fight, for the war to stop. It was yet another frustrating and utterly unproductive reversal by Trump.

Our president’s principal formula for peace appears to involve Kyiv’s giving up Ukrainian land that Russia has occupied by force. That idea is a nonstarter for Zelensky. Ukraine is the victim. Russia is the aggressor. Russia should stop the war and leave Ukrainian territory. The formula is simple, and it is the most sensible for the world beyond Russia, because a Russian victory in Ukraine will embolden Putin and thereby endanger all of Europe. After all, Putin’s great dream is to reconstitute a grand Russian empire. Yet Trump just cannot seem to wrap his head around this idea.

He cannot seem to grasp the concept that it is best to stop Putin in Ukraine so that NATO minus one (the U.S.) does not end up fighting Russia after a Putin victory in Ukraine. I say “minus one” because it is not clear at all that the U.S. under Donald Trump would stand with its allies in a conflict started by an expansionist Russia. Such a scenario would have been unthinkable before Putin appeaser Donald Trump became U.S. president. Now we have Trump apparently being more enthusiastic about putting U.S. troops on the streets of American cities than he is about sending weapons to Ukraine to help it fight for its freedom.

What is this mysterious hold that Vladimir Putin has over Trump? Why won’t our leader deal with Putin as the offender that the Russian is? For the sake of world peace, I hope that sooner rather than later we get an answer to this mystery. Something is rotten in it, and it stinks dangerously.

Europe learns to manage Donald J. Chamberlain

When the pro-Ukraine leaders of Europe heard that President Trump had decided to have last Friday’s Ukraine-specific face-to-face meeting with the invader Vladimir Putin, those European allies must have shot out of their chairs in alarm. Knowing that Putin exercises a kind of cordyceps hold on Trump’s mind, they would rightly have worried about what might result from the American president’s inability to show to Putin the toughness required as the Russian works to dismember Ukraine.

Trump has repeatedly said that Ukraine should not expect to recover territory within its borders that Russia has seized. That means Trump expects President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people simply to turn their backs on the approximately 20 percent of Ukraine that Russia significantly controls: all of the Crimean Peninsula and, generally, the eastern region of Ukraine known as Donbas, and some additional provinces.

A significant displacement of Ukrainians began in 2014 when Russia seized Crimea after a pro-European revolution occurred in Kyiv, and the displacement accelerated with the arrival of Russia’s full-on invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. Some 3 million Ukrainians now live under Russian authority on their own Ukrainian soil. In an ideal world, most Ukrainians would not agree to cede even an inch of their country’s territory to the Russian aggressor, but war might so exhaust and terrify them that they clamor to fold and walk away. Putin is counting on that. And Putin is counting on Trump to bring Zelenskyy to that acceptance.

Thus we have the spectacle of Trump, the president of the United States, running interference for the butcher Putin.

Our European allies have taken note.

When, after the Alaska meeting, it was announced that Zelenskyy and Trump would meet at the White House on Monday (yesterday), the European allies must have been even more alarmed. They and Zelenskyy would have recalled the disgraceful berating of the Ukrainian leader in the Oval Office in February by Trump and Vice President JD Vance. That White House meeting was an ambush against Zelenskyy.

This time around, Zelenskyy came with a posse of the willing: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte; European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen; Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni; Finnish President Alexander Stubb; German Chancellor Friedrich Merz; French President Emmanuel Macron; and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. They would not allow Zelenskyy to be ambushed by Trump a second time. And TACO Trump behaved himself.

While speaking on Fox by phone this morning (on the day after the meeting), Trump was asked by an interviewer how he had managed to bring so many European leaders to the Oval Office together so quickly. Well, Trump said, America is respected again. A year ago, he said, such a thing would not have happened.

He was wrong on the first point and right on the second. A year ago, such a gathering would not have occurred because it would not have been necessary. This country’s allies in Europe had respected this country enough that they fully expected that it would do right by Ukraine. On Monday, they came here to Washington, and quickly, to ensure that Trump did not abuse Zelenskyy and bully him into caving to Putin’s demands.

What happened at the White House on Monday was not a display of responsible American leadership, as the White House has been spinning it. What happened there was an intervention. Those leaders who visited knew that Trump just cannot quit Putin and that there was a risk of a second disgraceful Oval Office performance by Trump if Zelenskyy stepped into the snake pit by himself.

It has to be said that even as a doddering president with a foggy mind, Joe Biden had a mostly properly functioning moral compass. His doddering steps were nearly always pointing him in the right direction, and unerringly in the matter of Ukraine.

Not so with Trump. His inflated ego is the magnetic north that guides his moral compass. When he met with Putin on Friday, that was an exercise in self-gratification (he is desperate for a Nobel Peace Prize), and also appeasement.

The European leaders who visited us on Monday grasp the relevant history in a way that is far superior to Trump’s awareness of it. They remember Europe’s appeasement of Adolf Hitler as first he rearmed Germany in violation of post-World War I treaty limits, then remilitarized the Rhineland, then executed the annexation of Austria via the Anschluss, then purloined the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia and then invaded Czechoslovakia outright.

Next came Hitler’s triggering of the pivotal Danzig crisis, which ran through the summer of 1939 and was the last great spasm before that maniac launched what would become World War II. He wanted to retake control of Danzig, a largely ethnically German city over which Germany lost control with its defeat in WWI. But Danzig was now, by international treaty, a free city, the property of no particular nation, although it was connected administratively with its direct neighbor Poland. Germany, too, was a direct neighbor.

When Hitler signed a surprise nonaggression pact with Russia in late August 1939, providing himself security on his eastern front, France and Britain really began to panic. Britain was led by Neville Chamberlain, who in 1938 had appeasingly signed on the dotted line when Germany took the Sudentenland and Hitler gave an assurance that he had no further territorial ambitions. “Peace in our time,” Chamberlain said on his return from the now-infamous Munich Conference. How the British and the French cheered! How Hitler chortled!

A year later, the appeaser was recognizing his mistake and also stiffening his spine. But because he had earlier appeased Hitler, the tyrant did not think that his British adversary really would stand up if Germany invaded Poland. And if Britain did not stand up, neither would France, must have been Hitler’s calculation.

On Sept. 1, 1939, Germany and Russia attacked Poland. The rest is history.

It is a history that Europe remembers well. In Trump, Europe sees a new Chamberlain. The European leaders know that Ukraine is a modern Sudentenland, and they know that if Putin, a modern Hitler, is not stopped in Ukraine, Europe will end up fighting him in a wider war because he will not have been satisfied with forcing down the unpleasant meal that Ukraine has proved itself to be. Putin “hungers for sweeter meats,” to quote from “The Lord of the Rings.”

That is what Monday at the White House was really about. It was not an example of American leadership. It was an example of European leadership by intervention to head off a world-engulfing catastrophe. Thank God above that the Europeans are beginning to figure out how to handle Donald J. Chamberlain.